How to Choose a Capital Introduction Firm
The questions that separate a real network from a database — and the answers that should end the conversation.
The single most useful test is whether a firm will tell you no. An introducer whose relationships are genuine protects them by declining mandates it cannot serve. One that accepts every engagement is selling access to a list, and a list is not a network.
Ready to talk about your raise? We'll tell you quickly whether we can help.
Get in touchQuestions to ask
- Which specific investors would you introduce me to, and why those? A real answer names investor types, mandates and reasoning. A vague answer about an extensive network is a warning.
- When did you last decline a mandate, and why? A firm that has never declined one is not protecting its relationships.
- What is your relationship with these investors? Have they placed capital with your introductions before? Would they take your call today?
- Who actually does the work? The person selling you the engagement is not always the person making the introductions.
- What does your process look like before any outreach? If there is no assessment and no agreed target list, they are broadcasting.
- How do you get paid, and what triggers a fee? Then have counsel review the answer.
- What happens if it does not work? A firm that has thought about this honestly will tell you what they would do differently.
- Can I speak to two managers you have worked with, including one where it did not close? The second reference is the informative one.
Answers that should worry you
| What they say | What it usually means |
|---|---|
| "We have 5,000 investors in our network" | It is a database, not a network |
| "We can guarantee X meetings" | Introductions will be made regardless of fit, burning your credibility |
| "We're confident we can raise your fund" | Nobody controls whether an allocator commits |
| "We work with everyone in your space" | Including your competitors, with the same investors |
| "Our fee is a percentage of what you raise" | Not disqualifying, but requires counsel — see below |
| "We don't need to see your materials first" | There is no assessment stage, so there is no quality control |
| "You'll be one of our priority mandates" | Ask how many mandates they run concurrently, then do the arithmetic |
Check the network is real
Ask for investor-side references
Not just manager references. An introducer with genuine relationships can point to allocators who will confirm they take their calls.
Test specificity
Ask which three investors they would approach first for your specific strategy and size, and why. Generic answers indicate generic relationships.
Ask about declines
Which investors would they not approach for you, and why? Knowing where they lack coverage is evidence they know where they have it.
Check for conflicts
How many competing mandates do they run? Introducing four similar funds to the same investor helps none of them.
Look for honesty about the ceiling
Anyone who acknowledges that conversion is low industry-wide is describing reality. Anyone who does not is selling.
Contract terms to negotiate
- Exclusivity. Does the engagement prevent you working other channels? For a raise needing several investor types, exclusivity can cost more than the fee.
- Definition of introduction. What triggers a fee, precisely. Define it in writing at the outset.
- Pre-existing relationships. Investors already in your CRM should be carved out explicitly, by name, before work begins.
- Tail period. Commonly twelve to twenty-four months. Overlapping tails between intermediaries are the most common source of fee disputes.
- Termination. Notice period and what survives it.
- Reporting. You should see the target list, who was approached, responses and stage. Not seeing this is not acceptable.
On fee structure specifically
Compensation tied to the amount of capital raised deserves specific legal attention. In the United States, transaction-based compensation is one of the strongest indicators that a person is acting as a broker, which generally requires registration — and FINRA Rule 2040 means the manager paying an improperly structured fee is exposed too, not only the recipient. Have counsel review the structure before signing, whichever side you are on. More →
Is an introducer even the right answer?
Worth asking honestly. If your problem is that allocators meet you and decline, introductions will produce more declines faster. If your materials are not ready, introductions burn relationships you cannot get back. If your raise is not fundable as constructed, no intermediary fixes it.
Introduction work is for managers who can close a meeting but cannot generate one. A firm worth engaging will tell you which of those you are — and decline the mandate if it is the other.
Frequently asked questions
How do I evaluate a capital introduction firm?
Ask which specific investors they would approach and why, when they last declined a mandate, what their relationship with those investors actually is, who does the work, what happens before any outreach, how they are paid, and whether you can speak to a manager where it did not close.
What are the warning signs?
Large network numbers presented as a selling point, guarantees of meetings or outcomes, willingness to start without reviewing your materials, running many competing mandates in your strategy, and any reluctance to explain what triggers a fee.
Should I be worried about a success fee?
It is not disqualifying, but it requires legal review. In the US, compensation tied to capital raised is a strong indicator of broker activity requiring registration, and FINRA Rule 2040 means the paying manager is exposed as well as the recipient.
What contract terms matter most?
Exclusivity, the precise definition of what triggers a fee, an explicit carve-out for investors you already know, the tail period, termination notice, and a commitment to reporting that shows you the target list, who was approached and where each conversation stands.
What is a tail provision and why does it cause disputes?
A clause entitling an intermediary to a fee on capital closing after the engagement ends, where the investor was introduced during it. Tails commonly run twelve to twenty-four months, and where a manager uses more than one intermediary overlapping tails are the most common source of fee disputes.
How do I know if a network is real?
Ask for investor-side references, not only manager references. Test specificity by asking which three investors they would approach first for your strategy and why. Ask which investors they would not approach and where they lack coverage — knowing the gaps is evidence of knowing the network.
SeRuM provides introduction and networking services. We are not a registered broker-dealer, not a placement agent, and not an investment adviser. We do not offer, solicit or sell securities, we do not provide investment, legal, tax or accounting advice, and we do not make recommendations regarding any investment. Nothing on this website constitutes an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security, and no such offer will be made except through definitive offering documents provided by the issuer. All investment decisions, due diligence and negotiations are the sole responsibility of the parties involved. Investing in private funds and private companies involves substantial risk, including illiquidity and total loss of capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Next step
Tell us what you're raising.
Entity type, target size, timeline. That's enough for us to tell you quickly whether we can help — and to say so plainly if we can't.